Fed-Sudoku
Classic
Alternatives
Online variants
Krtek's cup
Talking
Hints (only SK)
Tournaments:
We like
Guest book
Reload
cauchy
9. 01. 2009 16:00:35
Tejal: welcome
It's nice to see you here
It's nice to see you here
gauravkorde
7. 01. 2009 19:33:41
@cauchy & Gotroch
Now there is the R&T couple on this site as well. So we can get some of their stuff as well...
They create good puzzles... some different types as well... :)
Now there is the R&T couple on this site as well. So we can get some of their stuff as well...
They create good puzzles... some different types as well... :)
Gotroch
7. 01. 2009 13:35:26
I think Cauchy wanted to encourage other readers of this Guest Book (not only Gaurav
) to share own sudoku creations.
So if you have something interesting, contact Ankora (address is ankora(at)fed-sudoku.eu ) and your puzzle will be here at our FED-Sudoku site, solvable in Online variats section.
) to share own sudoku creations. So if you have something interesting, contact Ankora (address is ankora(at)fed-sudoku.eu ) and your puzzle will be here at our FED-Sudoku site, solvable in Online variats section.
Ankora
7. 01. 2009 10:11:23
cauchy: I think he probably knows my contact ;-)
cauchy
7. 01. 2009 09:01:29
Gaurav:
very nice variant
, but I'm the one who makes mistakes due to classicc stereotypes and still restarts the puzzle 

And I like to try to solve another your sudoku variant as of another author (contact to Ankora is bottom - zavinac means the sign @).
very nice variant
, but I'm the one who makes mistakes due to classicc stereotypes and still restarts the puzzle 

And I like to try to solve another your sudoku variant as of another author (contact to Ankora is bottom - zavinac means the sign @).
gauravkorde
7. 01. 2009 08:36:47
Oh you already solved it.. :)
*This type of sudoku variant looks difficult, but it is very easy to solve.
I am looking forward to your next puzzle.*
actually the instructions look very simple and many people try to solve it just like classic. but its not.. and if you make a mistake, you have to restart the puzzle!!
Its my favourite type now. :)
*This type of sudoku variant looks difficult, but it is very easy to solve.
I am looking forward to your next puzzle.*
actually the instructions look very simple and many people try to solve it just like classic. but its not.. and if you make a mistake, you have to restart the puzzle!!
Its my favourite type now. :)
gauravkorde
7. 01. 2009 08:26:28
@Jakub
yes.. I created very easy puzzle because those who will try it for the first time will get confused. I guess people like you will be able to finish it in 3-4 min or even lesser. :)
yes.. I created very easy puzzle because those who will try it for the first time will get confused. I guess people like you will be able to finish it in 3-4 min or even lesser. :)
Gotroch
6. 01. 2009 21:24:35
Gaurav: It's nice to see another sudoku author here on FED-Sudoku.
Thanks for nice Blackout variant.
This type of sudoku variant looks difficult, but it is very easy to solve.
I am looking forward to your next puzzle.
Thanks for nice Blackout variant.
This type of sudoku variant looks difficult, but it is very easy to solve.
I am looking forward to your next puzzle.
Ales
4. 01. 2009 23:53:11
gauravkorde: Your personal statistics were incorrect due to my testing. I've forgotten to think about all consequences, thanks to you it was quite easy to repair...
To GTaK and JigKill - the problem is with generators. I have only one for GTaK, so I have to take it "as it is"... I hope jigsawkillers are not as hard as GTaKs, but if I set "easy level", there is a very low efficiency of getting a puzzle, so I use "medium level"...
We discussed difficulty of GTaK at start of Alternatives and the result was: "Yes, it's quite difficult, but you have whole week to find time to solve it, if you want. And there are some people who like it..." And maybe you will find some new techniques in GTaK or jigkill to be faster and make it in 15 minutes...
To GTaK and JigKill - the problem is with generators. I have only one for GTaK, so I have to take it "as it is"... I hope jigsawkillers are not as hard as GTaKs, but if I set "easy level", there is a very low efficiency of getting a puzzle, so I use "medium level"...
We discussed difficulty of GTaK at start of Alternatives and the result was: "Yes, it's quite difficult, but you have whole week to find time to solve it, if you want. And there are some people who like it..." And maybe you will find some new techniques in GTaK or jigkill to be faster and make it in 15 minutes...
gauravkorde
4. 01. 2009 08:32:00
I came 1st for the first time in Nonconsecutive yesterday but my statistics says i have come 1st 2 times!! :P
gauravkorde
3. 01. 2009 22:30:35
@squick
oh ok... anyways i dont like to solve them because i dont get that much time. i dont know when i will be called so in free time solving for 10-15 min is ok.
oh ok... anyways i dont like to solve them because i dont get that much time. i dont know when i will be called so in free time solving for 10-15 min is ok.
squick
3. 01. 2009 21:26:39
gauravkorde: you don't have to guess moves in GTaK or Jigsawkiller at all. There are always logical steps. Nevertheless, you have to look for them - sometimes it is a long way though :)
gauravkorde
3. 01. 2009 18:49:48
@Ankora & Ales
I think you should really look into GtaK and JigsawKiller puzzles.
The weekly ones are no fun. They is nothing much you can do except guess. and guessing surely is no fun specially when one has to guess 3-4 times in a puzzle.
Dont take this negatively. its just a message from critics point of view.
I hope you get my point that puzzles should be interesting and should encourage people to attempt those types.
Currently i just check the puzzles timings before and if average solver is taking 25min i dont even attempt it!!
these are just my views ... and i appreciate if you might be having some different objectives.
:)
I think you should really look into GtaK and JigsawKiller puzzles.
The weekly ones are no fun. They is nothing much you can do except guess. and guessing surely is no fun specially when one has to guess 3-4 times in a puzzle.
Dont take this negatively. its just a message from critics point of view.
I hope you get my point that puzzles should be interesting and should encourage people to attempt those types.
Currently i just check the puzzles timings before and if average solver is taking 25min i dont even attempt it!!
these are just my views ... and i appreciate if you might be having some different objectives.
:)
Rohan Rao
3. 01. 2009 05:53:34
I'm a little slow solving directly on the comp...as I'm not too comfortable yet.
Maybe I can improve with practise...
Maybe I can improve with practise...
Ales
1. 01. 2009 00:28:49
Happy New Year to all of you. We are glad you are with us here and as a gift let us introduce a tenth alternative - quadro (special thanks to janoslaw - author of this variation). Enjoy it.
cauchy&Gotroch
31. 12. 2008 20:26:52
Rohan.Rao: welcome
. It is pleasure for us to see you here
And to all of you: Happy New Year



. It is pleasure for us to see you here
And to all of you: Happy New Year




lono
27. 12. 2008 15:54:27
Nicky,Cert:Thank you
,I went for holiday with my family last 2 days so I can't reply on time,sorry
,I went for holiday with my family last 2 days so I can't reply on time,sorry
gauravkorde
26. 12. 2008 07:43:10
Jakub's best 44sec!!!



Nicky & Cert
25. 12. 2008 22:47:47
gauravkorde, lono: we wish you Merry Christmas too 



gauravkorde
25. 12. 2008 21:43:52
Merry Christmas to all of you
and a Happy and Prosperous New Year
and a Happy and Prosperous New Year
Show pages:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81,
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81,